Saint-Hilaire Blanquette de Limoux Brut 2010

Origin: , ,

Colour and type: ,
Main Variety:
Contributing varieties: ,

Saint-Hilaire Blanquette de Limoux Brut 2010

Saint-Hilaire Blanquette de Limoux Brut 2010

Depending on where you live, some of the WSET Diploma can feel theoretical only.  When I studied for the sparkling wine section, much of the focus was on Champagne, Cava, Crémant, Sekt, Italian styles and New World sparklers, all of which we were able to taste as part of our class, and which were also readily available for further study.  However, we were also expected to cover some lesser known wines, and today I have an example of one which I’m tasting for the first time, the Saint-Hilaire Blanquette de Limoux Brut 2005.

The sparkling wine exam was actually one of the easiest, in that the amount of material covered was fairly small.  You could almost be guaranteed that there would be  Champagne related question, and then it could be anything for the other two questions, but there were only so many topics.  My exam consisted of the fairly straightforward topics Négociant-manipulant, Cava DO, and Crémant.  The result was correspondingly high pass rate of 77%.  Had the Crémant question been swapped with a question on the sparkling wines of Limoux, I think the result might have been a bit different, because while I could have covered the basics, I had pages of detail on Crémant through not just France but Luxembourg as well.

Limoux is an appellation in the south of France in the hills leading up to the Spanish border.  It is among the coolest regions within Languedoc, with both altitude and distance from the sea setting it apart.  The climate is Mediterranean, though the influence of the Atlantic is felt more, further distinguishing it as cooler and wetter than its neighbouring regions.  The soils are rocky, with clay, sandstone and limestone making up distinct subzones.

While there is some production of still, red wine, the area is best known for sparkling, white wine.  It is claimed by locals to be the birthplace of sparkling wine, with records dating back to 1531, well before bubbles were mastered in Champagne.  The technique originally used is now known as Méthode Ancestrale, which involves bottling wine which has not finished fermenting.  The fermentation continues in bottle, resulting in a somewhat sweet, often cloudy wine with a relatively low level of alcohol and carbonation.  Blanquette de Limoux Méthode Ancestrale is a wine of the region made in that manner, exclusively from the Mauzac grape.  Blanquette in Occitan means white, though it often is used to refer to Mauzac in this context.

In addition, sparkling wine is made in the traditional method, with a second fermentation being instigated in bottle followed by disgorgement as opposed to the initial fermentation continuing and no disgorgement.  This takes the form of sparkling wine made under the labels Blanquette de Limoux (Méthode Traditionnelle) and Crémant de Limoux.  While both are produced in the same manner as Champagne, the difference between the two is that Blanquette de Limoux must be made up of at least 90% Mauzac, with Chardonnay and Chenin Blanc completing the blend, while Crémant de Limoux must be a majority of Chardonnay and Chenin Blanc, a minority of Mauzac, with a small portion of Pinot Noir permitted but not required.

Mauzac (Blanc), or sometimes Blanquette, is a white skinned grape largely found in the vicinity of Limoux or Gaillac 100km to the north.  While there are Mauzac Rosé and Mauzac Noir varieties as well, they are particularly rare and Mauzac without a colour almost always refers to the Blanc variety.  The grape buds and ripens late, which seems an odd choice for Limoux given its relatively cool and wet climate.  It has highly variable yields, which in part explains its decreasing popularity with growers.   It it typically picked early to retain acidity needed in sparkling wine, but often at the cost of the characteristic apple peel flavour that comes with further ripening.  In addition to Limoux and Gaillac, it’s apparently one of the permitted (but almost never used) white grapes of Bordeaux.  Wikipedia references a Decanter article that claims there are seven permitted white grapes, but other sources list eight, but all include Mauzac – news to me.

[A tweet from the good people at Rives Blanques after this was initially published informed me that Mauzac is also used in still white wine in AOC Limoux, where is it picked by hand, fermented and aged in bottle - something I overlooked in researching this post.  They of course would know, as they produce wines across AOC Limoux, AOC Blanquette de Limoux, and AOC Crémant de Limoux, as well as a few others.]

Like the Lambrusco of last week, information on this producer is somewhat thin on the ground, but I did manage to find a few titbits.  The name on the label, Saint-Hilaire, is the monastery where monks are said to have invented Vin Blanquette and Méthode Rurale in 1531.  The wine itself was produced at/by La Cave des Vignerons du Sieur d’Arques, a winemaking cooperative and the largest winery in Limoux.  This wine is not listed on their direct order website, and given that the front and back labels are in English (and that there’s a back label at all), I’m guessing this is produced exclusively for export.  At some point, after more research, it would be worth writing a post exclusively about cooperatives because they can be a huge part of trade depending on the area, but it’s rare that I (knowingly) encounter cooperative wines.

As to this wine in the glass, it is clear and bright with pale lemon green colour, multiple steady streams of bubbles, and a ring of bubbles where the glass meets the top of the pour.   On the nose it’s clean and developing, with medium minus intensity.  I get the classic baking powder note of carbon dioxide which often makes it difficult for me to smell anything else, but also some green apple and pear, and a hint of biscuit/dough.  On the palate it’s dry with medium plus acidity, medium body, medium minus alcohol, medium minus intensity, and a medium minus length.  It has notes of sour apple, herbs, and some hay or grass – not freshly cut New Zealand Sauvignon Blanc, but more dried and almost bitter.

I’ll give this a good, because there are no faults, even if it is lacking in a few key areas.  Since it’s my first Blanquette de Limoux I don’t have a reference point, but what I’ve read about Mauzac is spot on in terms of tasting so it gets full marks for typicity.  As with all first tries, it does make me wish I had another or a few so as to get a better sense of the style and quality, but most of all it makes me wish I had access to a varietal Mauzac to get me another step closer to a century of varietal wines.

Tilbrook Estate Moneypenny Adelaide Hills Sparkling Wine 2010

Origin: , ,

Colour and type: ,
Main Variety:
Contributing varieties:

Tilbrook Estate Moneypenny Adelaide Hills Sparkling Wine 2010

Tilbrook Estate Moneypenny Adelaide Hills Sparkling Wine 2010

Weird week here – the second sparkling wine this week, and two Australian wines back to back.  Not my normal routine, where I do try to mix things up, but this one came out of the blue and it seems like as good a time as any to give it a go.

First off, full disclosure:  I know the owner/winemaker as a friend, and have even done some work for him.  On the one hand, I wouldn’t write anything bad about him or his wine, but on the other hand, I know his wine to be good and therefore I’m not really too worried, despite not having tried this one before.

So Tilbrook Estate, a very small winery in the Adelaide Hills near Lobethal, with James Tilbrook doing almost all the work.  They produce a wide variety of wines, red and white, dry and sweet, and now not only still but also sparkling.  Of particular note, they do a very high quality Reserve Chardonnay as well as a very light and refreshing Botrytis Pinot Gris.

For knowing James, I am approaching this wine in a different manner than I would most wines.  In particular, James is from Suffolk,  England, and while it’s not exactly the deep south of England where some fantastic sparkling wine is being made these days, I’m approaching this sparkler as though it’s an Australian wine trying to be English, as opposed to an Australian wine trying to be from some other part of the Old World.

That said, this wine is made in a very traditional style, somewhat akin to something you might find in France.  The grapes are Pinot Noir and Chardonnay, which are about as traditional as you can get.  They’re whole bunch pressed, fermented in tank, with the second fermentation in bottle and then disgorged by hand with zero dosage.

Where it’s not traditional in the least is the closure.  This is not the first bottle of Australian sparkling wine I’ve seen under a crown cap, and I’m sure it won’t be the last.  Henschke does a sparkler which is very nice under crown cap as well.  However, it is a funny sight in that my mind immediately thinks it must be a huge bottle of beer.

Right – so having now tasted the wine, it is indeed very nice.  It has a fine colour – slightly less pale than the standard white wine shade and more toward straw.  The bubbles are quite persistent.  The nose is mild, with a little bit of biscuit.  On the palate, there is certainly the green apple advertised on the back label, but also some lemon, and a hint of vanilla.  It’s very well made, particularly as it’s a first vintage, though I believe James has done some work with a sparkling producer in Tasmania.

All in all, a nice drop, with more complexity that I was expecting, and I’m hoping it proves successful enough that we see more of it in the future.

Villa Jolanda Prosecco

Origin: , ,

Colour and type: ,
Main Variety:
Contributing varieties: , , , ,

Villa Jolanda Prosecco

Villa Jolanda Prosecco

Just a quick update to keep things moving along, with a charming sparkler from Italy. Tonight we opened up a bottle of Villa Jolanda Prosecco, and it absolutely hit the spot.

First, the facts.  I know pretty much nothing about this producer, Santero.  Their website suggests they make a wide range of wines in the north of Italy, but it’s not clear exactly where in their hierarchy this wine sits, in their carved range.  Best I stick with general information about Prosecco.

Prosecco is a white grape, and is typically used in the regions of Veneto and Friuli Venezia Giulia to make sparkling wine.  A somewhat funny thing is happening, or has happened with regard to the name.  Apparently the producers are trying to change the name of the grape to Glera, such that Prosecco will only refer to the wines made within the DOC(G) areas of Italy, and when used anywhere else it must be called Glera.  On the one hand, I can see a region trying to protect its interests, and Prosecco has become a brand on it’s own.  However, I think this is a pretty bogus effort, in that it’s a grape name, and grapes are transportable.  Italy is so difficult with regard to region versus grape name, but this is just silly.  You can protect and maintain, say, Champagne, because it is the name of the region, but trying to protect Chardonnay because it’s one of the grapes used is going too far.

A quick update from months later – I had originally assumed this to be a varietal Prosecco, which means of course I was wrong.  It’s 85% Prosecco, but the remainder is some mix of Chardonnay, Pinot Noir, Bianchetta, Perera and Verdiso, the last three being native grapes that were unknown to me until I went back to update my data on past posts.

Anyway, Prosecco is generally light and sometimes slightly sweet.  It’s secondary fermentation is done in tank, instead of the traditional method where the secondary fermentation takes place in bottle.  That makes it much cheaper to produce.  This wine is a non-vintage, which usually means it contains grapes from more than one year.  I’m not sure if it is common to blend across vintages with Prosecco in the way that it is with Champagne, but this wine was young and fresh.

Yes, about this wine in the glass – it was just right.  Normally I try to write about the qualities of the wine that one might expect should it be encountered, and so I have to give a few such descriptors.  It was fairly pale, a bit lighter than straw.  It had medium sized bubbles, which persisted through the meal.  The nose was light and fruity, the palate the same.  Not quite delicate, but crisp and light, despite a hint of sweetness.  It was of good, possibly very good quality.

However, this wine was perfect tonight.  It was a hot, muggy day, and for dinner we had sushi.  The wine went well with the fish, was refreshing in the face of the weather, and at under 12% alcohol wasn’t overbearing.  There are times when a wine is great in a vacuum, but this wine was perfect in context.

Pin is the address of the producer, alas some distance away from the origin of this wine in Veneto.